Causal Analysis and Mitigation of Spurious Onsets in Full-Duplex Speech LLMs
Speech-to-speech LLMs like Moshi, and its derivative PersonaPlex, can listen and speak concurrently through full-duplex generation.
Arxiv 2 versions
-
4 new sentences, beginning: “However, they can begin speaking inappropriately during prolonged user silence: under digital-zero input, Moshi and…”
Causal Analysis and Mitigation of Spurious Onsets in Full-Duplex Speech LLMs
Speech-to-speech LLMs like Moshi, and its derivative PersonaPlex, can listen and speak concurrently through full-duplex generation. However, they can begin speaking inappropriately during prolonged user silence: under digital-zero input, Moshi and PersonaPlex initiate speech in 30% and 27.5% of five-minute continuations, respectively. What causes this spurious speech? We investigate two hypotheses: either repeated sampling selects speech despite persistently low onset probabilities, or self-conditioning on nonspeech outputs causes an abrupt spike in onset probability. We find that, at every observed onset, speech probability spikes by over nine orders of magnitude in one 80-ms frame, supporting the latter hypothesis. Then, to suppress these onsets without blocking genuine responses, we ask a causal counterfactual question: is the model responding to user speech, or would its next-token distribution remain similar if the preceding user input were muted? Accordingly, we suppress onsets whose distributions change little under this intervention. Under realistic microphone noise, our method suppresses spurious onsets, while preserving genuine responses: one-sided 95% lower confidence bounds are 98.68% and 98.82% for Moshi, and 96.90% and 99.25% for PersonaPlex. Our inference-time method runs in real-time without retraining, with 95th-percentile decision time below 61 ms, within the 80-ms frame budget. Our code is available at https://github.com/KentoNishi/icassp27-spurious-onsets.
-
Causal Analysis and Mitigation of Spurious Onsets in Full-Duplex Speech LLMs
Speech-to-speech LLMs like Moshi, and its derivative PersonaPlex, can listen and speak concurrently through full-duplex generation. However, they can begin speaking inappropriately during prolonged user silence: under digital-zero input, Moshi and PersonaPlex initiate speech in 12/40 and 11/40 five-minute continuations, respectively. What causes this spurious speech? We investigate two hypotheses: either repeated sampling selects speech despite persistently low onset probabilities, or conditioning on the model's nonspeech outputs causes an abrupt spike in onset probability. We find that, at every observed onset, speech probability spikes by over nine orders of magnitude in one 80-ms frame, supporting the latter hypothesis. Then, to suppress these onsets without blocking genuine responses, we ask a causal counterfactual question: is the model responding to user speech, or would its next-token distribution remain similar if the preceding user input were muted? Accordingly, we suppress onsets whose distributions change little under this intervention. Across 40 held-out trials per model with realistic microphone noise, our method suppresses 13/13 Moshi and 9/9 PersonaPlex spurious onsets, while preserving 40/40 genuine responses per model. Our inference-time method requires no retraining and runs in real-time, with 95th-percentile decision time below 61 ms, within the 80-ms frame budget. Our code is available at https://github.com/KentoNishi/icassp27-spurious-onsets.
Versions are compared on the headline and summary the publisher puts in their feed. An edit to the body of an article that leaves both untouched will not appear here.
Why am I seeing this Ranked on source trust — arXiv
It ranks mainly on source trust: arXiv is the most reliable outlet we track on this subject, and is the only one on the story so far.
The classifier could not identify the subject from the text, so the section was inherited from the source feed. We do not summarise what we cannot identify — this one links straight out.
Link-outLink-out, because the subject could not be identified from the text. Link-out means we point at the publisher and say nothing of our own.
| Factor | Weight | Score | Contribution | Where it came from |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corroboration | 0.35 | 0.39 | +0.135 26% | 1 independent org on the story. Tier-3 aggregators never corroborate — they can show something is circulating, never that it is true. |
| Source trustleads | 0.25 | 0.85 | +0.212 41% | arXiv is the highest-trust source on this story and is first-party — the organisation announcing its own news. Trust is taken from the best source, not averaged. |
| Pickup rate | 0.20 | 0.00 | +0.000 0% | One counted organisation, so there is no spread to measure — nothing has picked this up to set a rate. |
| Freshness | 0.20 | 0.85 | +0.171 33% | Halves every 10 hours from the newest item on the story. This is the only factor that rewards a story for nothing more than being recent. |
Corroboration counts distinct organisations, once each, and only from tiers 1 and 2. Freshness halves every 10 hours, so this ranking is a snapshot and will differ at the next build.
What happened
Speech-to-speech LLMs like Moshi, and its derivative PersonaPlex, can listen and speak concurrently through full-duplex generation. However, they can begin speaking inappropriately during prolonged user silence: under digital-zero input, Moshi and PersonaPlex initiate speech in 30% and 27.5% of five-minute continuations, respectively. We investigate two hypotheses: either repeated sampling selects speech despite persistently low onset probabilities, or self-conditioning on nonspeech outputs causes an abrupt spike in onset probability. We find that, at every observed onset, speech probability spikes by over nine orders of magnitude in one 80-ms frame, supporting the latter hypothesis.
How this story arrived
Ordered by when each source was first observed, which is what the velocity figure is computed from. Publishers backdate; observed order does not.
- 01 Arxivfirst-party first seen Causal Analysis and Mitigation of Spurious Onsets in Full-Duplex Speech LLMs
Overclock clusters coverage from independent sources and grades it automatically. The figures above are computed, not editorial. This page summarises and links to reporting by the outlets named — follow the links for the original work.