Sparse Data Augmentation for Optimization with Provable Guarantees
-cross Abstract: In nonconvex optimization problems arising in geometric machine learning, data augmentation is commonly used to promote invariance…
Arxiv 2 versions
-
1 new sentence, beginning: “-cross Abstract: In nonconvex optimization problems arising in geometric machine learning, data augmentation is commonly used…”
Sparse Data Augmentation for Optimization with Provable Guarantees
-cross Abstract: In nonconvex optimization problems arising in geometric machine learning, data augmentation is commonly used to promote invariance by averaging empirical losses over transformations of the data. Computing the fully augmented objective, however, requires access to every element of the transformation group $G$, which may be prohibitively expensive when $G$ is large or accessible only through sampling. We study whether full augmentation can instead be approximated using a small, fixed sample of transformations acquired before optimization and reused thereafter. Under suitable regularity conditions, we show that, with probability at least $1-\delta$, gradient descent (GD) on the resulting sparsely augmented objective returns an $\varepsilon$-stationary point of the fully augmented objective using $\mathcal{O}\bigl((\log |G|+\log(1/\delta))/\varepsilon^2\bigr)$ group-transformation-oracle queries. By comparison, standard group stochastic gradient descent (group-SGD), which samples a fresh transformation at every iteration, uses $\mathcal{O}(1/\varepsilon^4)$ transformation queries. Therefore, gradient descent with fixed sparse augmentation requires fewer transformation queries than both GD applied to the fully augmented objective and group-SGD. Our proof techniques, which may be of independent interest, establish a uniform approximation of the full group-averaged gradient field by a random group average using spectral properties of group-induced operators and tools from representation theory.
-
Sparse Data Augmentation for Optimization with Provable Guarantees
In nonconvex optimization problems arising in geometric machine learning, data augmentation is commonly used to promote invariance by averaging empirical losses over transformations of the data. Computing the fully augmented objective, however, requires access to every element of the transformation group $G$, which may be prohibitively expensive when $G$ is large or accessible only through sampling. We study whether full augmentation can instead be approximated using a small, fixed sample of transformations acquired before optimization and reused thereafter. Under suitable regularity conditions, we show that, with probability at least $1-\delta$, gradient descent (GD) on the resulting sparsely augmented objective returns an $\varepsilon$-stationary point of the fully augmented objective using $\mathcal{O}\bigl((\log |G|+\log(1/\delta))/\varepsilon^2\bigr)$ group-transformation-oracle queries. By comparison, standard group stochastic gradient descent (group-SGD), which samples a fresh transformation at every iteration, uses $\mathcal{O}(1/\varepsilon^4)$ transformation queries. Therefore, gradient descent with fixed sparse augmentation requires fewer transformation queries than both GD applied to the fully augmented objective and group-SGD. Our proof techniques, which may be of independent interest, establish a uniform approximation of the full group-averaged gradient field by a random group average using spectral properties of group-induced operators and tools from representation theory.
Versions are compared on the headline and summary the publisher puts in their feed. An edit to the body of an article that leaves both untouched will not appear here.
Why am I seeing this Ranked on source trust — arXiv
It ranks mainly on source trust: arXiv is the most reliable outlet we track on this subject, and is the only one on the story so far.
The classifier could not identify the subject from the text, so the section was inherited from the source feed. We do not summarise what we cannot identify — this one links straight out.
Link-outLink-out, because the subject could not be identified from the text. Link-out means we point at the publisher and say nothing of our own.
| Factor | Weight | Score | Contribution | Where it came from |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corroboration | 0.35 | 0.39 | +0.135 26% | 1 independent org on the story. Tier-3 aggregators never corroborate — they can show something is circulating, never that it is true. |
| Source trustleads | 0.25 | 0.85 | +0.212 41% | arXiv is the highest-trust source on this story and is first-party — the organisation announcing its own news. Trust is taken from the best source, not averaged. |
| Pickup rate | 0.20 | 0.00 | +0.000 0% | One counted organisation, so there is no spread to measure — nothing has picked this up to set a rate. |
| Freshness | 0.20 | 0.85 | +0.171 33% | Halves every 10 hours from the newest item on the story. This is the only factor that rewards a story for nothing more than being recent. |
Corroboration counts distinct organisations, once each, and only from tiers 1 and 2. Freshness halves every 10 hours, so this ranking is a snapshot and will differ at the next build.
What happened
-cross Abstract: In nonconvex optimization problems arising in geometric machine learning, data augmentation is commonly used to promote invariance by averaging empirical losses over transformations of the data. Computing the fully augmented objective, however, requires access to every element of the transformation group $G$, which may be prohibitively expensive when $G$ is large or accessible only through sampling. We study whether full augmentation can instead be approximated using a small, fixed sample of transformations acquired before optimization and reused thereafter.
How this story arrived
Ordered by when each source was first observed, which is what the velocity figure is computed from. Publishers backdate; observed order does not.
- 01 Arxivfirst-party first seen Sparse Data Augmentation for Optimization with Provable Guarantees
Overclock clusters coverage from independent sources and grades it automatically. The figures above are computed, not editorial. This page summarises and links to reporting by the outlets named — follow the links for the original work.